Radio Link Coordination with Wind Farms
The current Government drive to find renewable sources of
energy has resulted in the rapid development of wind farms.
Wind energy is likely to be the single greatest contributor
to the Government’s "10% by 2010" renewable energy
target and "30% by 2020" renewable aspiration. But there is a
downside: by virtue of the size of modern wind turbines and
their location on the landscape, they have the potential to
obstruct radio paths and also act as massive reflectors
of radio energy. The effect has been described as being
similar to a dance hall mirrorball, although the number of
reflecting surfaces on a wind turbine is smaller.
Because of their large moving surfaces their
effect is difficult to predict and constantly changing.
Although wind turbines have a detrimental effect on all
radio communications, their effect on mobile systems, such
as cell phones, will not be as great as on fixed systems.
Mobile systems are designed to operate in a rapidly
changing radio propagation environment but radio
communication systems designed to interact with mainly
fixed infrastructure are vulnerable to the detrimental
effects of wind turbines. The systems most affected are
those which rely on a stable propagation environment such
as aircraft radars, television and fixed data systems.
Although turbine blades are not of metallic construction they
can nevertheless reflect and diffract radio waves. The
lightning protection schemes built into turbine blades can
further enhance their reflective radio properties.
The interference effects of wind turbines on radar systems
and analogue terrestrial TV systems have been investigated
extensively. Ofcom, and its predecessor, the
Radiocommunications Agency undertook some theoretical work on
the potential for wind turbines to interfere with microwave
fixed links but, because of the relatively small size of the
market for utility telemetry radio systems, less research has
been directed at this service.
JRC has been assessing the potential for wind farms to cause
interference to gas and electricity industry Ultra High
Frequency (UHF) telemetry links for several years. We have
co-ordinated over 1500 wind farm applications in the last 24
months. These telemetry links in most cases are an integral
part of the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA)
systems used by utilities for monitoring and controlling
their networks - including the infrastructure connecting the
wind farms to the grid. Interruption to the reliable
operation of these links compromises the integrity of the UK
energy generation, transmission and distribution systems.
In 2002, the then Radiocommunications Agency (now the Office
of Communications) issued a paper that attempted to model the
environment with respect to line-of-sight (LOS) microwave
(above 3 GHz) links and wind farms. The method used by JRC is an adaption
of this LOS Microwave method that takes into account the
added complexity of non-LOS paths and the use of much
lower frequencies than were considered in the
Radiocommunications Agency paper.
These UHF telemetry links are normally
planned on the basis of approximately 99.9% availability.
UHF frequencies are particularly suited to this
application as a single hop can provide a reliable link
over a 40 km path, and it is not necessary to have a
line-of-sight path from transmitter to receiver.
The ability of UHF telemetry systems to operate over
obstructed paths is the feature that creates the greatest
potential for incompatibility with wind turbines.
Because wind turbines frequently occupy the higher ground
and protrude above the landscape they act as radio reflectors
so that the reflected path of one of these links could, via
the wind turbine, be much superior to the intended path over
the landscape. The reflected signal can be strong enough
to deteriorate the wanted signal.
So that JRC can properly assess the potential effect of a wind
farm on existing telemetry links it was necessary to develop
a methodology that, as accurately as possible, allows us to
model the situation. It is desirable that the model is as
accurate as possible as there is a lot of investment on both
sides and sloppy co-ordination can waste a lot of everyone's
time, effort and money. A rigorous science-based approach to
the subject is essential.
|